<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			
			<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
			<title>Rob Huddleston&apos;s Blog - Writing</title>
			<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm</link>
			<description>The personal blog of Rob Huddleston. I&apos;ll try to keep things on-topic and related to web design and the suite of Adobe tools I use daily: Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Fireworks, ColdFusion, Flex, but I reserve the right to occasionally wonder off topic if the mood strikes...</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:11:26 -0600</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:52:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor>rob@robhuddleston.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>rob@robhuddleston.com</webMaster>
			
			<item>
				<title>Word 2010?s Navigation Pane</title>
				<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2009/11/22/Word-2010s-Navigation-Pane</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve been using Office 2010 for several months now. I&apos;m not sure what combination of lucky circumstances combined to have Microsoft invite me to be on an early &quot;technical preview&quot; of the beta, but what the heck. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My first impressions were decidedly un-impressed. The interface is mostly the same as that of Office 2007. (For the record: I very much like the Office 2007 interface. I&apos;ll admit it takes some getting used to, but it&apos;s mostly an improvement.) Outlook has been given a facelift to match the rest of the Office suite. The File menu (what Microsoft called the &quot;Office Button&quot; in 2007 has been renamed back to the more appropriate &quot;File Menu&quot; this time around) takes over the whole screen ? which I&apos;m not sure I like ? but has some useful additions. I am particularly a fan of the new Print dialog, which at long last includes Print Preview.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mostly, however, I just dug in and started working in Word 2010. When I said above that I wasn&apos;t overly impressed it wasn&apos;t because of anything partiularly wrong with the software; I just didn&apos;t see much that was different. Because its interface was, as I mentioned, mostly the same as the 2007 interface, I didn&apos;t really spend much time playing around trying to discover new features. Okay, I&apos;ll be honest. I didn&apos;t spend &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; time looking for new things. Thus, I was pretty shocked this week when I stumbled upon what has to be the single coolest feature of Office 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, some background. Over the last three years, I&apos;ve spent a lot of time in Word, an obvious side effect of writing books. Quite often, I thank the years I spent teaching Word, since there is no doubt that being a &quot;power user&quot; makes my life much easier today. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My books all have to follow very specific formatting rules. My publisher provides me with a template that I use for writing. The template is actually nothing more than an empty Word document with a bunch of predefined styles. Back when I used to teach Word regularly, I would tell my students that using and understanding styles was the single most important thing to know about Word. With the introduction of the Navigation pane, styles just became even more useful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Navigation Pane is in fact something that I stumbled across purely by accident, thanks to another change that was made. I recently had cause to do a find and replace in one of the chapters of my latest book. Word has long had separate shortcuts for Find (ctrl-F) and Replace (ctrl-H); however, since both traditionally occupied the same dialog box, I have always used the ctrl-F shortcut, even when I needed Replace. I did this mostly because every other program in which I regularly use Find and Replace combines them into a single dialog, with ctrl-F as the shortcut. So, when I went to use the feature in 2010, I was a bit shocked when ctrl-F did not open the normal dialog box, but instead, this strange Navigation Pane suddenly appeared down the right side of my screen. I spent a few minutes trying to figure out where the heck Replace was, before finally determining that that functionality hadn&apos;t been moved from its original location along with Find. (That does mean that unfortunately I&apos;m going to have to train myself to use ctrl-H from now on for Replace, which is the one bad point in this saga.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I quickly discovered a nice feature of the new Find in word: it now searches as you type. For instance, in the picture below, I only needed to type &quot;bur&quot; for it to find Burke, the fictional realty company used in the class. It also displays the results more like a search engine, giving a few words or sentences to either side of the found term, and allowing you to click to jump to that spot in the document. Both the search-as-you-type and display of the results should make finding instances of terms in Word much, much easier and far nicer than the old method, whereby you had to keep repeatedly clicking the &quot;Find Next&quot; button to get to the next result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/images/navPaneFind.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Word 2010 navigation pane&apos;s find feature&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Due to confidentiality agreements, I can&apos;t show anything from the book, so I&apos;m using a practice file from a Word class for these screenshots.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Find, however, isn&apos;t what&apos;s great about the Navigation Pane. Instead, it&apos;s the other two tabs that make this feature so nice. The middle tab is a Browse Pages feature. If you&apos;ve ever looked at a PDF document in Adobe Acrobat, you&apos;ll be familiar with this: it shows a small thumbnail of each page in the document. Again, you can simply click on a thumbnail to jump to that point in the document.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/images/navPanePages.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Word 2010 navigation pane&apos;s pages feature&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other tab (which is actually the first tab, since I&apos;m doing this in reverse order) is what really got my attention. I&apos;m currently writing a book in Wiley&apos;s Bible series. As such, each chapter has a series of main headings, with one and sometimes two levels of headings below each main heading. The first page of each chapter has a list of the main topics, and the last page, a bulleted summary. In both cases, I need to be sure to go through the chapter and be certain that each topic is in the list. Prior to discovering the Navigation Pane, that required a ton of scrolling up and down through the chapter. Now, thanks to this feature, I won&apos;t have to do that anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This first tab shows the Outline view. Word has long had the ability to read its Heading styles and generate an outline from them. In fact, for many years you&apos;ve been able to take that outline and automatically generate a table of contents or even a PowerPoint presentation from it. However, from the work I need to do, it still wasn&apos;t terribly useful, as it was a completely separate view that only displayed the outline levels. In Word 2010, they&apos;ve taken that outline view and placed it in the Navigation Pane, where it is more easily accessible. It&apos;s also really useful, since you can simply click on a heading in the view and jump right to that point in the document.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/images/navPaneOutline.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Word 2010 navigation pane&apos;s outline view&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another issue I&apos;ve been having throughout the development of the book is numbering figures. In each chapter, I need to reference each figure sequentially. For example, the first figure in chapter 7 would be 7.1, the second 7.2, and so forth. My problem is that often I&apos;ll add a figure, and then write for quite awhile before I hit the next one. By that point, I can&apos;t quite recall which number I&apos;m on, so again, I had to start scrolling up the document to find it. Even more challenging was the editing process: if I add several figures in the middle of a chapter, I not only have to figure out what number to use to start, but then be sure that every subsequent figure gets renumbered as well. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That problem is now gone as well. The Navigation Pane is set to work with Word&apos;s outline level, which is part of a style definition. This again is nothing new ? it&apos;s just been made more useful. Because Wiley was already requiring that I format the figure references with a style, all I needed to do was to go into the style definition and add that the figure style was part of the outline. Once I did that, each of my figure references appears in the Navigation pane as well, meaning that I can tell at a glance which number I&apos;m on and as easily tell if any figures have incorrect numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s impossible for me to tell exactly how much time this feature is going to save, but it&apos;ll be a lot. For me, there&apos;s no question that this feature alone will justify the cost of upgrading to Office 2010 when it is finally released.&lt;/p&gt; 
				</description>
				
				<category>Writing</category>				
				
				<category>General</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:52:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2009/11/22/Word-2010s-Navigation-Pane</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>ActionScript: Your visual blueprint for creating interactive projects in Flash CS4 Professional</title>
				<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2009/7/1/ActionScript-Your-visual-blueprint-for-creating-interactive-projects-in-Flash-CS4-Professional</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;Last night, when I got home, I had a big box waiting on my porch ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/images/asbook.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;ActionScript book cover&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is available now from Amazon and your local bookstore. Enjoy!&lt;/p&gt; 
				</description>
				
				<category>Writing</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:11:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2009/7/1/ActionScript-Your-visual-blueprint-for-creating-interactive-projects-in-Flash-CS4-Professional</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>HTML, XHTML and CSS visual blueprint errata</title>
				<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/12/6/HTML-XHTML-and-CSS-visual-blueprint-errata</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;A reader of my HTML book, Omar, emailed today and pointed out an error in my &quot;HTML, XHTML, and CSS: Your visual blueprint to designing effective web sites&quot; book. On page 142, while I correctly describe the process for creating ID selectors in the main text, I have a note between steps 2 and 3 that says, &quot;Note: Remember that ID names must begin with a period.&quot; Obviously, this is wrong: ID names must begin with a pound sign.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These books really are very carefully edited. Not only do I read over the text an almost nauseating number of times, but its also read by the project editor, the copy editor, and the tech editor. And yet even with all of those eyes looking at it, mistakes still slip though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve written to Wiley and asked that an errata section by added to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wiley.com/go/html2008vb&quot;&gt;book&apos;s official web site&lt;/a&gt;. It&apos;s not that I necessarily expect more errors, but the reality is that they probably exist, and hey, even if there is but this one, it&apos;s still worth noting on the site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So many thanks to Omar for bringing my attention to the error.&lt;/p&gt; 
				</description>
				
				<category>Writing</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/12/6/HTML-XHTML-and-CSS-visual-blueprint-errata</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>HTML Book Errata</title>
				<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/9/21/HTML-Book-Errata</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;An astute reader, Mike, emailed me this morning about getting the sample files for &lt;cite&gt;HTML, XHTML, and CSS: Your visual blueprint&amp;trade; for designing effective Web pages.&lt;/cite&gt; He said that he was trying to go to the web site mentioned in the book, but that it didn&apos;t work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sure enough, the publisher made a boo-boo. On page xiii in the introduction section, there&apos;s a reference to www.html2008vb as the site for the book. Well, that address can&apos;t possibly be right - it&apos;s not even complete! Unfortunately, unless the very unlikely scenario occurs where the book was to be reprinted, there&apos;s nothing that can be done to correct the error. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The good news, though, is that the back cover has another reference to the site, and this one is correct: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wiley.com/go/html2008vb&quot;&gt;http://www.wiley.com/go/html2008vb&lt;/a&gt;. So please ignore the incorrect address inside the book and use the one on the back cover instead.&lt;/p&gt; 
				</description>
				
				<category>Writing</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:12:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/9/21/HTML-Book-Errata</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>Finished ... sort of ...</title>
				<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/9/9/Finished--sort-of-</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;A just finished the writing portion of Book #3. At 640 pages, it&apos;s actually longer than the first two books combined. To be honest, I&apos;m surprised I&apos;ve been able to keep up with the writing, since my deadlines were spaced out at almost the same rate as for the first two books, despite there being over twice as much stuff to write. I can definitely feel it, though: it &lt;em&gt;seems&lt;/em&gt; like it has taken a lot longer to write this one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, I&apos;m not &lt;em&gt;done&lt;/em&gt; done yet. This week, I have the really grueling part of the process to do: the screen shots. That&apos;s the big thing everyone asks when they see these books, and so here&apos;s the answer: yes, I really do have to do all of the screenshots myself. Since the format of the book calls for what works out to 2 screenshots per page, that means that I will have done well over 1200 for this one book. And I now have a week in which to do the final quarter of those - over 300. It is definitely the part of the process that I dread the most. The good news is that it takes a lot less concentration, so I can generally watch TV or be otherwise semi-distracted while I do the screenshots, whereas I need total concentration to do the writing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My final deadline in Friday, so I have my work cut out for me this week. But I definitely plan to relax and, for the first time in 6 months, not think about this book over the weekend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, even then I won&apos;t be completely done. I&apos;ll still have the author review to do - that&apos;s when I get the comments back from the editor and tech editor, and have to go back through the book and fix everything that needs fixing. But that&apos;s not nearly as involved as the writing and screenshotting. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting next week, even before I get the first chapters back for the review, I am going to start thinking about what I want to do for book #4. I actually have two ideas already, so I need to weigh them in my mind, decide which seems more interesting, and then make the proposal to my editor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for tonight at least, &lt;strong&gt;I&apos;m done.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
				</description>
				
				<category>Writing</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:09:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/9/9/Finished--sort-of-</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>It&apos;s here!</title>
				<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/5/25/Its-here</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;My copies of my latest book arrived this week while I was in Florida. My wife didn&apos;t even realize what it was, since I get random boxes of books from publishers all the time (one of the fringe benefits of running a user group.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s pretty cool that they put my name on the cover this time. And to preemptively answer what is probably the most commonly asked question from the first book: yes, I really did have to do all of the screen shots myself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/htmlbook/cover.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;HTML, XHTML and CSS: Your visual blueprint to creating effective web sites cover&quot; /&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/htmlbook/titlepage.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;HTML, XHTML and CSS: Your visual blueprint to creating effective web sites title page&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
				</description>
				
				<category>Writing</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/5/25/Its-here</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>Finished writing book #2</title>
				<link>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/2/2/Finished-writing-book-2</link>
				<description>
				
				Yesterday afternoon, I officially finished the writing of my second book, &lt;em&gt;HTML, XHTML, and CSS: Your visual blueprint &amp;trade; to creating effective websites.&lt;/em&gt;.
I&apos;m not yet completely done - I still have to do the screen shots for the last few chapters, and then of course proof read everything - but it&apos;s nice to be finished writing, anyway. 
				</description>
				
				<category>Writing</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:28:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.robhuddleston.com/index.cfm/2008/2/2/Finished-writing-book-2</guid>
				
			</item>
			</channel></rss>